Deprecated: $wgMWOAuthSharedUserIDs=false is deprecated, set $wgMWOAuthSharedUserIDs=true, $wgMWOAuthSharedUserSource='local' instead [Called from MediaWiki\HookContainer\HookContainer::run in /var/www/html/w/includes/HookContainer/HookContainer.php at line 135] in /var/www/html/w/includes/Debug/MWDebug.php on line 372
Analysis of takeover time and convergence rate for harmony search with novel selection methods - MaRDI portal

Analysis of takeover time and convergence rate for harmony search with novel selection methods (Q462650)

From MaRDI portal





scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6359396
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Analysis of takeover time and convergence rate for harmony search with novel selection methods
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6359396

    Statements

    Analysis of takeover time and convergence rate for harmony search with novel selection methods (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    21 October 2014
    0 references
    Summary: Recently, common selection schemes used in harmony search algorithm (HSA) are altered in memory consideration operation to imitate the natural selection principle of survival of the fittest. The selection schemes adopted include: random, proportional, tournament, and linear rank. In this paper, these selection schemes are analysed in order to evaluate their effect on the performance of HSA. The analysis considers takeover time and convergence rate to measure the effectiveness of each selection scheme. Furthermore, a scaled proportional selection scheme is proposed to replace the proportional selection scheme to overcome its shortcoming with negative fitness values. To study the effect of these different selection schemes we use eight global optimisation functions with different characteristics. An experimental evaluation shows that linear rank selection provides the highest convergence speed and highest takeover time. On the other hand, scaled proportional selection provides the slowest convergence speed and slowest takeover time. This indicates the effect of the type of the selection method used in memory consideration in takeover time and convergence rate.
    0 references
    harmony search algorithm
    0 references
    evolutionary algorithms
    0 references
    selection mechanisms
    0 references
    metaheuristics
    0 references
    takeover time
    0 references
    convergence rate
    0 references
    natural selection
    0 references
    global optimisation
    0 references
    numerical examples
    0 references

    Identifiers