Analysis of takeover time and convergence rate for harmony search with novel selection methods (Q462650)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Analysis of takeover time and convergence rate for harmony search with novel selection methods |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6359396
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Analysis of takeover time and convergence rate for harmony search with novel selection methods |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6359396 |
Statements
Analysis of takeover time and convergence rate for harmony search with novel selection methods (English)
0 references
21 October 2014
0 references
Summary: Recently, common selection schemes used in harmony search algorithm (HSA) are altered in memory consideration operation to imitate the natural selection principle of survival of the fittest. The selection schemes adopted include: random, proportional, tournament, and linear rank. In this paper, these selection schemes are analysed in order to evaluate their effect on the performance of HSA. The analysis considers takeover time and convergence rate to measure the effectiveness of each selection scheme. Furthermore, a scaled proportional selection scheme is proposed to replace the proportional selection scheme to overcome its shortcoming with negative fitness values. To study the effect of these different selection schemes we use eight global optimisation functions with different characteristics. An experimental evaluation shows that linear rank selection provides the highest convergence speed and highest takeover time. On the other hand, scaled proportional selection provides the slowest convergence speed and slowest takeover time. This indicates the effect of the type of the selection method used in memory consideration in takeover time and convergence rate.
0 references
harmony search algorithm
0 references
evolutionary algorithms
0 references
selection mechanisms
0 references
metaheuristics
0 references
takeover time
0 references
convergence rate
0 references
natural selection
0 references
global optimisation
0 references
numerical examples
0 references