On the central limit theorem along subsequences of sums of i.i.d. random variables (Q465632)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: On the central limit theorem along subsequences of sums of i.i.d. random variables |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6360957
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | On the central limit theorem along subsequences of sums of i.i.d. random variables |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6360957 |
Statements
On the central limit theorem along subsequences of sums of i.i.d. random variables (English)
0 references
24 October 2014
0 references
Let \(X,X_{1},X_{2},\dots{}\) denote i.i.d.\ random variables with mean \(\operatorname{E}X=0\) and partial sums \(S_{n}=X_{1}+\dots{}+X_{n}\). Suppose that \(X\) is in the domain of attraction of the normal distribution, i.e., there exists a sequence \(\lambda (n)\) such that (i) \(S_{n}/\sqrt{n\lambda (n)}\Longrightarrow Z\thicksim N(0,1)\) as \(n\rightarrow \infty \). If (i) holds, then (ii) \(S_{n(k)}/\sqrt{ n(k)\lambda (n(k))}\Longrightarrow Z\) for any subsequence \(n(k)\rightarrow \infty \). In this paper, the authors investigate the implication (ii) \( \Longrightarrow \) (i) and prove that, if \(\lambda (n)\rightarrow \infty \), this implication is false. In the same spirit, the authors study the Marcinkiewicz-Zygmund weak law of large numbers and they prove that \( S_{n(k)}/n^{1/p}(k)\rightarrow 0\) does not imply that \(S_{n}/n^{1/p} \rightarrow 0\).
0 references
central limit theorem
0 references
Marcinkiewicz-Zygmund weak law of large numbers
0 references
sums of i.i.d. random variables
0 references
subsequences
0 references