If the Dittus and Boelter equation is really the McAdams equation, then should not the McAdams equation really be the Koo equation? (Q533278)
From MaRDI portal
 | This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: If the Dittus and Boelter equation is really the McAdams equation, then should not the McAdams equation really be the Koo equation? |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5883021
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | If the Dittus and Boelter equation is really the McAdams equation, then should not the McAdams equation really be the Koo equation? |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5883021 |
Statements
If the Dittus and Boelter equation is really the McAdams equation, then should not the McAdams equation really be the Koo equation? (English)
0 references
2 May 2011
0 references
convection
0 references
correlations
0 references
heat transfer coefficient
0 references
turbulent
0 references
pipe flow
0 references
friction factor
0 references
0.62719214
0 references
0.6156296
0 references
0.60600495
0 references
0.6051594
0 references
0.6034678
0 references
0.60237795
0 references
0.5957799
0 references
