Deprecated: $wgMWOAuthSharedUserIDs=false is deprecated, set $wgMWOAuthSharedUserIDs=true, $wgMWOAuthSharedUserSource='local' instead [Called from MediaWiki\HookContainer\HookContainer::run in /var/www/html/w/includes/HookContainer/HookContainer.php at line 135] in /var/www/html/w/includes/Debug/MWDebug.php on line 372
Domination graphs: Examples and counterexamples - MaRDI portal

Domination graphs: Examples and counterexamples (Q5936465)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1613404
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Domination graphs: Examples and counterexamples
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1613404

    Statements

    Domination graphs: Examples and counterexamples (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    8 April 2002
    0 references
    A domination graph is a graph \(G\) with the property that every induced subgraph \(H\) of \(G\) contains a pair of vertices \(x\), \(y\) such that in \(H\) the open neighbourhood of \(x\) is a subset of the closed neighbourhood of \(y\). Dahlhaus et al. have described an algorithm called the special quadratic consensus method. For a given graph \(G\) this algorithm returns TRUE, if \(G\) is a domination graph. The authors also conjecture that conversely the answer TRUE means that \(G\) is a domination graph. The present paper gives a counterexample. Further special classes of graphs, namely trapezoid graphs and tolerance graphs, are considered and proved to be domination graphs. Also the generalized join decomposability of graphs is studied.
    0 references
    domination graph
    0 references
    trapezoid graphs
    0 references
    tolerance graphs
    0 references
    generalized join decomposability
    0 references

    Identifiers