Why \(3+1\) metric rather than \(4+0\) or \(2+2\)? (Q5947908)
From MaRDI portal
 | This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Why \(3+1\) metric rather than \(4+0\) or \(2+2\)? |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1666298
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Why \(3+1\) metric rather than \(4+0\) or \(2+2\)? |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1666298 |
Statements
Why \(3+1\) metric rather than \(4+0\) or \(2+2\)? (English)
0 references
23 October 2001
0 references
group theory
0 references
irreducible unitary representations
0 references
infinite-dimensional representations
0 references
