Hamiltonian formalism and the state of a physical system (Q5948840)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Hamiltonian formalism and the state of a physical system |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1672079
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Hamiltonian formalism and the state of a physical system |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1672079 |
Statements
Hamiltonian formalism and the state of a physical system (English)
0 references
12 November 2001
0 references
mass point
0 references
momentum
0 references
position
0 references
probability density function
0 references
Schrödinger equation
0 references
state
0 references
In five chapters the authors offer a new point of departure -- the Schrödinger equation with implications different from those of Newton's second law.NEWLINENEWLINENEWLINE1. \textit{Introduction} gives a short review of the historical development.NEWLINENEWLINENEWLINE2. \textit{Newton's law and the state of a physical system} defines the basic notions such as e.g. particle, position vector, acceleration vector, etc. and describes the classical way of examining the motion of a mass point. The physicists found that it is more convenient to use the position and momentum of it and define the ``state'' of a particle. The statistical conditions lead to the probability density function at time 0. Two examples explain the proposed manner.NEWLINENEWLINENEWLINE3. \textit{Energy and the Hamiltonian} narrows the considerations to the conservative motions. Hamilton's equations of motion are derived. Three examples help to understand the ideas.NEWLINENEWLINENEWLINE4. \textit{Classical mechanics for n particles} shows the corresponding Hamilton's equations for such a case. An example of two coupled harmonic oscillators helps us to see the application of the proposed thoughts.NEWLINENEWLINENEWLINE5. \textit{Why the Hamiltonian formalism}? defines, first, the notion of a Lagrangian and the Euler-Lagrange equations of motion. Then follows a sketch of a historical connection between the Hamiltonian formalism and the nonrelativistic quantum mechanics. As a consequence the Schrödinger equation is shown.NEWLINENEWLINENEWLINEA table summarizes the difference between the various approaches.NEWLINENEWLINENEWLINEWith 4 figures and 12 references.
0 references