Eisenstein series and approximations to \(\pi\) (Q5954253)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Eisenstein series and approximations to \(\pi\) |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1699437
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Eisenstein series and approximations to \(\pi\) |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1699437 |
Statements
Eisenstein series and approximations to \(\pi\) (English)
0 references
17 February 2002
0 references
singular moduli
0 references
approximations to \(\pi\)
0 references
Eisenstein series
0 references
0 references
0.8990948
0 references
0.8869494
0 references
The first purpose of this paper is to elucidate some marginal notes of Ramanujan found in his ``lost notebook''. It turns out that these notes give relations between certain values of \(Q^3\) and \(R^2\) where \(Q\) and \(R\) are Ramanujan's usual notations for the Eisenstein series of weight 4 and 6. The authors discover that the values are at \(q=-\exp (-\pi\sqrt n)\) with \(n=11\), 19, 27, 43, 67, 163 and 51. The authors first deduce Ramanujan's relations from known values of modular functions at singular moduli. Having done this they introduce Ramanujan's function \(P\), which is not quite a modular form of weight 2. They introduce two sequences \(a_n\) and \(b_n\) which depend on the values \(P,Q\) and \(R\) at the points given above. These lead, at least in the cases above, to relations of the formNEWLINE\[NEWLINEQ^{-1/2} \left(\sqrt {\text{n.P}}-{6\over\pi} \right)= \text{explicit algebraic number}NEWLINE\]NEWLINE where \(P\) and \(Q\) are evaluated at \(-\exp(-\pi \sqrt n)\). One can also regard these formulae, when combined with the series expansions of \(P\) and \(Q\), as giving approximations to \(\pi\). In the final two sections the authors use the differential equation satisfied by \(P\) and the modular equation for \(j\) to develop a self-contained proof of this result. Again they discuss several numerical examples. They also discuss the relationship of their results to those of the Borweins and the Chudnovskys.
0 references