\(\theta\)-congruent numbers and Heegner points (Q5955994)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: \(\theta\)-congruent numbers and Heegner points |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1708278
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | \(\theta\)-congruent numbers and Heegner points |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1708278 |
Statements
\(\theta\)-congruent numbers and Heegner points (English)
0 references
2 December 2003
0 references
Let \(\theta\) be a real number with \(0<\theta<\pi\). A natural number \(n\) is said to be \(\theta\)-congruent if there exists a triangle with rational sides and an angle \(\theta\) whose area is \(n\sqrt {r^2-s^2}\), where \(\cos \theta=s/r\) with \(r,s\in \mathbb{Z}\), \(\text{gcd} (r,s)=1\), and \(r>0\). In this paper the authors prove that a prime number congruent to 23 modulo 24 is \(\pi/ 3\)-congruent. One of the ingredients of their proof is a theorem due to \textit{M. Fujiwara} [Number Theory, K. Győry, A. Pethő, V. T. Sós (eds.), de Gruyter, 235-241 (1998; Zbl 0920.11035)], which says that a natural number \(n\) is \(\theta\)-congruent if and only if the elliptic curve \(E_{n,\theta}\) defined by \(y^2=x(x+(r+s)n) (x-(r-s)n)\) has a rational point of order greater than two. Another ingredient is given by a theorem due to \textit{B. J. Birch} [Symp. Math. 15, 441-445 (1975; Zbl 0317.14015)]: Suppose that an elliptic curve \(E\) has a modular parametrization \(\varphi:X_0 (N)\to E\) such that the Atkin-Lehner involution acts non-trivially on \(E\) through \(\varphi\). Suppose further that \(\varphi(0) \notin 2E(\mathbb{Q})\) and \(p\) is a prime number such that \(-p\) is congruent to a square modulo \(4N\). Then the quadratic twist \(E^{(-p)}\) of \(E\) associated with \(\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{-p})/ \mathbb{Q}\) has infinitely many rational points. Noting that \(E_{p,\pi/3}\) is the quadratic twist \(E^{(-p)}_{1,2 \pi/3}\), and that there exists a parametrization \(\varphi:X_0 (48)\to E_{1,2\pi/3}\), the authors show that \(\varphi (0) \notin 2E_{1,2\pi/3} (\mathbb{Q})\) through an explicit computation, and thereby finish the proof.
0 references
congruent numbers
0 references
elliptic curves
0 references
Atkin-Lehner involution
0 references
quadratic twist
0 references