Invariance of homotopy and an extension of a theorem by Habets-Metzen on periodic solutions of Duffing equations (Q5958903)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Invariance of homotopy and an extension of a theorem by Habets-Metzen on periodic solutions of Duffing equations |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1721785
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Invariance of homotopy and an extension of a theorem by Habets-Metzen on periodic solutions of Duffing equations |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1721785 |
Statements
Invariance of homotopy and an extension of a theorem by Habets-Metzen on periodic solutions of Duffing equations (English)
0 references
4 February 2003
0 references
invariance of homotopy
0 references
coincidence degree
0 references
existence
0 references
periodic solution
0 references
Duffing equation
0 references
The author considers boundary value problems such as NEWLINE\[NEWLINE \begin{multlined} x''+f(t,x,x')x'+g^+(t,x,x')x^++g^-(t,x,x')x^-+h(t,x,x')=0,\\ x(0)=x(1),\quad x'(0)=x'(1), \end{multlined}\tag{1}NEWLINE\]NEWLINE where the functions \(f(t,x,x')\) and \(g^{\pm}(t,x,x')\) are Carathéodory functions that satisfy the conditions \(a(t)\leq f(t,x,x')\leq b(t)\), \(c^{\pm}(t)\leq g^{\pm}(t,x,x')\leq d^{\pm}(t)\) and \(|h(t,x,x')|\leq e(t)\) for some \(a\), \(b\), \(c^{\pm}\), \(d^{\pm}\), \(e\in L^1(0,1)\). The author aims to prove the existence of solutions to (1) if the problem NEWLINE\[NEWLINEx''+p(t)x'+q^+(t)x^++q^-(t)x^-=0, \qquad x(0)=x(1),\quad x'(0)=x'(1),NEWLINE\]NEWLINE has no nontrivial solutions for every \(p\), \(q^{\pm}\in L^1(0,1)\) such that \(p(t)\in [a(t),b(t)]\) and \(q^{\pm}(t)\in[c^{\pm}(t),d^{\pm}(t)]\). Such a result is false for the Dirichlet problem, might be true for the periodic one and would generalize several previous works. Unfortunately, the argument presented by the author uses an assumption, \(q^{\pm}\in {\mathcal F}_n(p)\), which he claims unnecessarily.
0 references