Incorporating heterogeneity in non-parametric models: a methodological comparison (Q604781)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Incorporating heterogeneity in non-parametric models: a methodological comparison |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5815551
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Incorporating heterogeneity in non-parametric models: a methodological comparison |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5815551 |
Statements
Incorporating heterogeneity in non-parametric models: a methodological comparison (English)
0 references
12 November 2010
0 references
Summary: The operational environment can heavily influence the efficiency scores of the evaluated observations. If heterogeneity among entities is neglected, the efficiency evaluation is strongly biased. In this paper, we discuss five methodologies to incorporate heterogeneity in non-parametric frontier models which are robust for outlying observations. In particular, we examine the frontier separation approach, the all-in-one model, the two-stage model, the multi-stage approach and the conditional efficiency measures. We discuss their appropriateness on a simulated and a real-world drinking water data set. Although, the outcomes are closely related on average, the robust conditional efficiency procedure seems to be superior.
0 references
environmental variables
0 references
DEA
0 references
data envelopment analysis
0 references
FDH
0 references
free disposal hull
0 references
heterogeneity
0 references
non-parametric models
0 references
water industry
0 references
efficiency scores
0 references
modelling
0 references
drinking water
0 references