On the two types of affine structures for degenerating Kummer surfaces -- non-Archimedean vs Gromov-Hausdorff limits -- (Q6163769)
From MaRDI portal
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7704873
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | On the two types of affine structures for degenerating Kummer surfaces -- non-Archimedean vs Gromov-Hausdorff limits -- |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 7704873 |
Statements
On the two types of affine structures for degenerating Kummer surfaces -- non-Archimedean vs Gromov-Hausdorff limits -- (English)
0 references
30 June 2023
0 references
The paper compares two integral affine manifolds attached to degenerations of Kummer surfaces, which are special types of \(K3\) surfaces. Such surfaces are constructed from an abelian surface by taking the quotient by \(\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}\) acting by multiplication by \(-1\) and resolving the \(16\) singularities, coming from the \(2\)-torsion points. Motivated by the Strominger-Yau-Zaslow conjucture in mirror symmetry, to any degeneration of a Calabi-Yau, in particular, to a degeneration of a Kummer surface, one can attach two integreal affine manifolds with singularities. The first one, constructed by Kontsevich-Soibelman, using non-Archimedean techniques, can also be described as a dual intersection complex of a dlt model of the degeneration [\textit{J. Nicaise} and \textit{C. Xu}, Am. J. Math. 138, No. 6, 1645--1667 (2016; Zbl 1375.14092)]. The second integral affine manifold is defined as the Gromov-Hausdorff limit of the Ricci flat metric on the Camabi-Yau, which exists by Yau's proof of the Calabi conjecture. Relating these two constructions, one coming from algebraic geometry and the other from Riemannian geometry is a challenging task. In general, it is an open conjecture of Kontsevich-Soibelman that these two integral affine manifolds are the same. The author proves this conjecture for degenerations of Kummer surfaces. The proof uses the construction of Kummer surfaces as quetients of abelian surfaces. In particular, it uses the work of Künnemann on degenerations of abelian varieties, to construct nice degenerations of Kummer surfaces, with good enough properties so that one can understand the structure of the dual intersection complex [\textit{K. Künnemann}, Duke Math. J. 95, No. 1, 161--212 (1998; Zbl 0955.14017)].
0 references
non-Archimedean geometry
0 references
Kummer surface
0 references
SYZ conjecture
0 references
Kontsevich-Soibelman conjecture
0 references
0 references
0 references
0 references