Equivalence of \(K\)- and \(J\)-methods for limiting real interpolation spaces (Q647634)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Equivalence of \(K\)- and \(J\)-methods for limiting real interpolation spaces |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5978502
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Equivalence of \(K\)- and \(J\)-methods for limiting real interpolation spaces |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5978502 |
Statements
Equivalence of \(K\)- and \(J\)-methods for limiting real interpolation spaces (English)
0 references
24 November 2011
0 references
The aim of this paper is to give an equivalence theorem between real interpolation spaces using the \(J\)-method and those using the \(K\)-method. (See Theorem 4.7.) This theorem was known in the case \(0<\theta <1,\) but certain questions in function spaces have motivated the investigation of the limiting real interpolation spaces. These limiting real interpolation spaces including logarithmic terms in their definition are considered in the present paper and Theorem 4.7 is proved for them. The motivation to obtain such a result consists in applications to approximation of stochastic integrals. (See Section 5.)
0 references
limiting interpolation spaces
0 references
\(J\)-functional
0 references
\(K\)-functional
0 references
Lorentz-Zygmund spaces
0 references
Besov spaces
0 references