On the complexity of learning strings and sequences (Q688167)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: On the complexity of learning strings and sequences |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 440339
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | On the complexity of learning strings and sequences |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 440339 |
Statements
On the complexity of learning strings and sequences (English)
0 references
28 November 1993
0 references
It is shown that strings (sequences) are not learnable by strings (sequences) in the distribution-free (pac-) learning model proposed by Valiant. The key role in the argument is played by the results on the complexity of consistent superstring and consistent supersequence problems. The consistent superstring problem is defined as follows: given two collections of strings, called positive examples and negative examples, decide whether there exists a string containing all positive examples as substrings and no negative example as a substring. The consisting supersequence problem is defined similarly. Both problems are proved to be NP-complete.
0 references
learning
0 references
consistent superstring problem
0 references
consisting supersequence problem
0 references
NP-complete
0 references
0 references
0.8838512
0 references
0 references
0.8612638
0 references
0.8605093
0 references
0.85968786
0 references
0.85968786
0 references
0.85311407
0 references