Ramanujan's ``lost'' notebook. IX: The partial theta function as an entire function (Q702706)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Ramanujan's ``lost notebook. IX: The partial theta function as an entire function |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2128866
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Ramanujan's ``lost'' notebook. IX: The partial theta function as an entire function |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2128866 |
Statements
Ramanujan's ``lost'' notebook. IX: The partial theta function as an entire function (English)
0 references
17 January 2005
0 references
In Ramanujan's ``lost'' notebook, it is claimed that \[ \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a^nq^{n^2} = \prod_{n=1}^{\infty} \left(1 + aq^{2n-1}(1 + y_1(n) + y_2(n) + \cdots) \right), \] where \[ \begin{aligned} y_1(n) &= \frac{\sum_{j \geq n} (-1)^jq^{j^2+j}}{\sum_{j \geq 0} (-1)^j(2j+1)q^{j^2+j}}\\ \text{and} y_2(n) &= \frac{\left(\sum_{j \geq n} (j+1)(-1)^jq^{j^2+j}\right) \left(\sum_{j \geq n} (-1)^jq^{j^2+j} \right) } {\left(\sum_{j\geq 0} (-1)^j(2j+1)q^{j^2+j} \right)^2}. \end{aligned} \] This is reminiscent of the identity treated Part VIII: The entire Rogers-Ramanujan function [Adv. Math. 191, No. 2, 393--407 (2005; Zbl 1067.11062)]. Indeed, Andrews uses more or less the same method to prove the above assertion. One notable difference is that the key polynomials were orthogonal in that paper but are not orthogonal in the present case.
0 references
partial theta functions
0 references
entire functions
0 references