Calculus versus topology: comprehension versus abstraction (Q705509)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Calculus versus topology: comprehension versus abstraction |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2131580
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Calculus versus topology: comprehension versus abstraction |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2131580 |
Statements
Calculus versus topology: comprehension versus abstraction (English)
0 references
31 January 2005
0 references
This is a comment on [\textit{U. Höhle}, ``Topological aspects of non-convergent sequences - a comment on Burgin's concept of fuzzy limits'', Fuzzy Sets Syst. 149, No. 3, 399-412 (2005; Zbl 1092.26023)]. The authors accept Höhle's comment as ``a fair mathematical paper with interesting results''. They justify their renunciation of topology by their emphasis on simplicity and comprehension. Not commented by the authors is Höhle's reproach that Burgin's statements often ``have more to do with an oracle than with clear scientific information. What is neoclassical analysis, what is fuzzy mathematics?''
0 references
fuzzy limits
0 references
limit points
0 references