A counterexample in the theory of prehomogeneous vector spaces (Q757600)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: A counterexample in the theory of prehomogeneous vector spaces |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4191996
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | A counterexample in the theory of prehomogeneous vector spaces |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4191996 |
Statements
A counterexample in the theory of prehomogeneous vector spaces (English)
0 references
1990
0 references
Let (G,\(\rho\),V) be a complex prehomogeneous vector space, i.e., there exists an open dense G-orbit \(\Omega\) in V. If G is reductive and if (G,\(\rho\),V) is regular, then \(\Omega\) is an affine variety. It seemed that the regularity condition is essential but the reductivity condition is not. The author proves that the two conditions of this statement are essential by giving an example. Namely, he constructs an example of a regular prehomogeneous vector space (G,\(\rho\),V) such that G is not reductive and \(\Omega\) is not affine.
0 references
complex prehomogeneous vector space
0 references
affine variety
0 references
regularity
0 references
reductivity
0 references
regular prehomogeneous vector space
0 references
0.91378874
0 references
0 references
0.9019248
0 references
0.8959411
0 references
0.8950233
0 references
0.89326954
0 references
0 references