Constructive formalization of the Tennenbaum theorem and its applications (Q803126)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Constructive formalization of the Tennenbaum theorem and its applications |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4200196
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Constructive formalization of the Tennenbaum theorem and its applications |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4200196 |
Statements
Constructive formalization of the Tennenbaum theorem and its applications (English)
0 references
1990
0 references
The author introduces the theory \(CHA=HA+CT+M\), i.e. Heyting arithmetic extended by Church's thesis and Markov's principle. Some other theories closely related to CHA are introduced and investigated (e.g. \(CHA^ 2)\). An interesting analogue of Tennenbaum's result (there are no recursive nonstandard models of arithmetic - cf. \textit{S. Tennenbaum}, ``Non- archimedean systems of arithmetic'', Am. Math. Soc., Notices 6, 270 (1959)) is proved. Using it the author establishes new results on predicate logics. Two of them are stated below. Any class of arithmetical formulas closed via derivability in CHA is called a constructive arithmetical theory (CAT). Let T be a CAT. A predicate formula \({\mathcal U}(P_ 1,...,P_ n)\) is called T-universal iff for all arithmetical formulas \(F_ 1,...,F_ n\) the formula \({\mathcal U}(F_ 1,...,F_ n)\) lies in T. The class of all T-universal formulas is denoted by L(T). [For details cf. the author's paper in Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Mat. 41, 483-502, 717 (1977; Zbl 0373.02032).] Theorem. If T is a CAT, then \(T\leq_ lL(T)\), i.e. the set of Gödel numbers of formulas of T is l-reducible to the set of the ones of L(T). Theorem. The structure of all CATs together with the relation \(\subseteq\) of inclusion is isomorphic to the structure of all predicate logics L(T) (where T denotes a CAT) together with the relation \(\subseteq.\) Reviewer's remark. There are some misprints in the paper. The most serious one takes place in Theorem 3, where derivability of \(\forall x\exists y R(x,y)\) is stated but derivability of \(\forall x\exists y R(y,x)\) is proved.
0 references
constructive arithmetic
0 references
Heyting arithmetic
0 references
Church's thesis
0 references
Markov's principle
0 references
predicate logics
0 references
Gödel numbers
0 references