Stabilization of the viscoelastic Euler-Bernoulli type equation with a local nonlinear dissipation (Q846288)
From MaRDI portal
| This is the item page for this Wikibase entity, intended for internal use and editing purposes. Please use this page instead for the normal view: Stabilization of the viscoelastic Euler-Bernoulli type equation with a local nonlinear dissipation |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5667598
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Stabilization of the viscoelastic Euler-Bernoulli type equation with a local nonlinear dissipation |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5667598 |
Statements
Stabilization of the viscoelastic Euler-Bernoulli type equation with a local nonlinear dissipation (English)
0 references
8 February 2010
0 references
The authors consider the viscoelastic Euler-Bernoulli type initial-boundary value problem with a localized damping term: \[ u_{tt}+\Delta^2u-M(\| u\|^2)\Delta u- \int_0^tg(t-\tau)\Delta^2u(\tau)\,d\tau+\rho(x,u_t)=0\quad \text{in }\Omega\times \mathbb{R}_+, \] \[ u=\frac {\partial u}{\partial \nu}=0\quad \text{on }\Gamma\times \mathbb{R}_+; \qquad u(x,0)=u_0(x), \quad u'(x,0)=u_1(x),\qquad x\in \Omega, \] where \(\Omega\subset \mathbb{R}^n\) is a bounded domain, \(n\geq 1\), with a boundary \(\Gamma=\Gamma_0\cup \Gamma_1\) of the \(C^2\) class, where \(\Gamma_0\) and \(\Gamma_1\) are closed and disjoint, \(\Gamma_0\neq \emptyset\) and satisfying the conditions \( m\cdot \nu\geq 0>0\) on \(\Gamma_1\), \(m\cdot \nu\leq 0\) on \(\Gamma_0\), \(m(x)=x-x_0\) \((x_0\in \mathbb{R}^n)\). Further \(M\in C^1(\mathbb{R}_+)\), \(g:\mathbb{R}_+\to \mathbb{R}_+\) and \(\rho(x,s)\) is almost everywhere differentiable in \(x\) and nondecreasing in \(s\). The work is devoted to prove the existence of global solutions and decay for the energy of solutions. Due to my opinion the assumptions for the boundary cannot be fulfilled for the \(C^2\) boundary. The strong convergence (3.22) is wrong, in order to pass to the limit in the equation it suffices the strong convergence in \(C([0,T];H^1_0(\Omega))\) instead of \(C([0,T];V)\), \(V=H^2_0(\Omega)\).
0 references
existence of solution
0 references
energy decay
0 references
Euler-Bernoulli equation
0 references
local dissipation
0 references
localized damping term
0 references
0.9179835
0 references
0.91699827
0 references
0.9167224
0 references
0.91488785
0 references
0.9146992
0 references
0.9125995
0 references
0.90737915
0 references
0.90680945
0 references
0.9065505
0 references