On the dimension of the Hilbert scheme of curves (Q971491)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On the dimension of the Hilbert scheme of curves
scientific article

    Statements

    On the dimension of the Hilbert scheme of curves (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    14 May 2010
    0 references
    Let \(\text{Hilb}^{P}({X})\) be the Hilbert scheme of smooth connected non-degenerate curves \(C \subset X\) with Hilbert polynomial \(P(m)=dm+1-g\) where \(X\) is either \({\mathbb P}^3\), \({\mathbb P}^4\) or a smooth quadric threefold \(Q\) in \({\mathbb P}^4\). Let \(U\) be any irreducible component of \(\text{Hilb}^{P}({X})\). In this paper, the author gives a good lower bound for the dimension of \(U\) for \(X= {\mathbb P}^3\) in the range \(g^2 \geq d^3\) (Theorem 1.3). In proving this result, the author needs to calculate the Euler characteristic \( \chi(N_{C/S})\) of the normal sheaf where \(S\) is a smooth surface containing \(C\) and the variation of \( \chi(N_{C/S})\) which we need when \(S\) is singular (the latter is not easy). If \(X=Q\) the author shows that if \(g^2 > d^3/2\) (resp. \(g^2 < 4d^3/1125\)) up to lower degree terms, then \(\dim U \) is always greater than the expected value \(3d\) (resp. there exists a component with \(\dim U = 3d\)). To get the existence result he uses smoothing techniques introduced by \textit{E. Sernesi} [Invent. Math. 75, 25--57 (1984; Zbl 0541.14024)]. Finally recall that a curve \(C \subset {\mathbb P}^r\) is called rigid if every deformation of \(C\) is induced by an automorphism of \({\mathbb P}^r\). For \(X={\mathbb P}^4\) the author shows that there are no rigid curve in a range asymptotically given by \(g^2 > 9d^3\), thus contributing to a conjecture of \textit{J. Harris} and \textit{I. Morrison} [Moduli of curves. New York, NY: Springer (1998; Zbl 0913.14005)], stating that only normal rational curves are rigid. Reviewer's remark: In Theorem 2.1 there is a missing number 1 in Peskine-Gruson's result on the maximum genus. This makes Proposition 2.2 slightly inaccurate; one should there replace \(g\) by \(g-1\), or exclude e.g. complete intersections in the conclusion. To correct the inaccuracy, one may in Theorem 1.3 redefine \(\mu\) by replacing \(g\) by \(g-1\) in the definition.
    0 references
    0 references
    Hilbert scheme
    0 references
    deformation
    0 references
    space curve
    0 references
    rigid curve
    0 references
    smoothing
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references