Environmental policy with upstream pollution abatement technology firms

DOI10.1016/J.JEEM.2008.04.001zbMath1154.91596OpenAlexW2146779246MaRDI QIDQ1002018

Knut Einar Rosendahl, Mads Greaker

Publication date: 20 February 2009

Published in: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2008.04.001

zbMATH Keywords

environmental innovationsporter hypothesisstrategic environmental policy

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Environmental economics (natural resource models, harvesting, pollution, etc.) (91B76)

Related Items (5)

A differential game of R\&D investment for pollution abatement in different market structures ⋮ Abatement R\&D, market imperfections, and environmental policy in an endogenous growth model ⋮ Regulatory attitudes and environmental innovation in a model combining internal and external R\&D ⋮ A dynamic general equilibrium model of pollution abatement under learning by doing ⋮ Endogenous abatement technology agreements under environmental regulation

Cites Work

• Incentives for advanced pollution abatement technology at the industry level: An evaluation of policy alternatives
• Environmental policy and international trade when governments and producers act strategically
• Strategic environmental policy; eco-dumping or a green strategy?
• Spillovers in the development of new pollution abatement technology: a new look at the Porter-hypothesis
• Can a Small Nation Gain from a Domestic Carbon Tax? The Case with R&D Externalities

This page was built for publication: Environmental policy with upstream pollution abatement technology firms