The sizes of the three popular asymptotic tests for testing homogeneity of two binomial proportions

DOI10.1016/j.csda.2006.03.006zbMath1157.62337OpenAlexW2021153676MaRDI QIDQ1010408

Seung-Ho Kang, Yonghee Lee, Eun Sug Park

Publication date: 6 April 2009

Published in: Computational Statistics and Data Analysis (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2006.03.006

zbMATH Keywords

likelihood ratio testnuisance parameterchi-square testcontingency tablecontinuity correctiontype I error rate

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Nonparametric hypothesis testing (62G10) Contingency tables (62H17) Asymptotic properties of parametric tests (62F05)

Related Items (1)

Which Exact Test is More Powerful in Testing the Hardy–Weinberg Law?

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Bounds on the size of the \(\chi ^ 2\)-test of independence in a contingency table
• Bounds on the size of the likelihood ratio test of independence in a contingency table
• Small-Sample Comparisons of Exact Levels for Chi-Squared Goodness-of-Fit Statistics
• Pearson's X 2 and the Loglikelihood Ratio Statistic G 2 : A Comparative Review
• Test of Significance for 2 × 2 Contingency Tables
• A comparison of tests of homogeneity for sparse contingency tables
• An Analysis of Variance for Categorical Data, II: Small Sample Comparisons with Chi Square and Other Competitors
• P Values Maximized Over a Confidence Set for the Nuisance Parameter
• Inaccuracy of the X 2 Test of Goodness of Fit when Expected Frequenies are Small
• A Comparison of the Three Conditional Exact Tests in Two-way Contingency Tables Using the Unconditional Exact Power
• Some Methods for Strengthening the Common χ 2 Tests

This page was built for publication: The sizes of the three popular asymptotic tests for testing homogeneity of two binomial proportions