Preference aggregation and DEA: an analysis of the methods proposed to discriminate efficient candidates
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1014984
DOI10.1016/j.ejor.2008.06.031zbMath1159.90449OpenAlexW2037625587WikidataQ58341397 ScholiaQ58341397MaRDI QIDQ1014984
Teresa Peña, Bonifacio Llamazares
Publication date: 30 April 2009
Published in: European Journal of Operational Research (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: http://uvadoc.uva.es/handle/10324/36229
Related Items (13)
Cross-ranking of decision making units in data envelopment analysis ⋮ Ranking of petrochemical companies using preferential voting at unequal levels of voting power through data envelopment analysis ⋮ Improved Kemeny Median Indicator Ranks Accordance Method ⋮ Volume‐based ranking method for a ranked voting system ⋮ A new approach for ranking of candidates in voting systems ⋮ Analytical hierarchy process: revolution and evolution ⋮ An integrated data envelopment analysis and simulation method for group consensus ranking ⋮ A novel approach for discriminating efficient candidates by classifying voters in the preferential voting framework ⋮ Robust winner determination in positional scoring rules with uncertain weights ⋮ A maximum discrimination DEA method for ranking association rules in data mining ⋮ New approaches for determining a common set of weights for a voting system ⋮ Scoring rules and social choice properties: some characterizations ⋮ Aggregating preferences rankings with variable weights
Cites Work
- The appropriate total ranking method using DEA for multiple categorized purposes
- Preference voting and project ranking using DEA and cross-evaluation
- A ranked voting system using a DEA/AR exclusion model: A note
- A stochastic dominance analysis of ranked voting systems with scoring
- A method for discriminating efficient candidates with ranked voting data.
- A Data Envelopment Model for Aggregating Preference Rankings
- A Procedure for Ranking Efficient Units in Data Envelopment Analysis
This page was built for publication: Preference aggregation and DEA: an analysis of the methods proposed to discriminate efficient candidates