A clarifying comparison of methods for controlling the false discovery rate

DOI10.1016/j.jspi.2008.10.010zbMath1160.62069OpenAlexW2006279547MaRDI QIDQ1015854

Christine E. Soteros, Yaling Yin, Mikelis G. Bickis

Publication date: 30 April 2009

Published in: Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2008.10.010

zbMATH Keywords

multiple testingfalse discovery rate

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Parametric hypothesis testing (62F03) Paired and multiple comparisons; multiple testing (62J15)

Related Items

Evaluations of FDR-controlling procedures in multiple hypothesis testing, Statistical and Knowledge Supported Visualization of Multivariate Data

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• On the Benjamini-Hochberg method
• The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency.
• Some results on false discovery rate in stepwise multiple testing procedures.
• On the False Discovery Rate and Expected Type I Errors
• Empirical Bayes Analysis of a Microarray Experiment
• Strong Control, Conservative Point Estimation and Simultaneous Conservative Consistency of False Discovery Rates: A Unified Approach
• A Note on the Adaptive Control of False Discovery Rates
• A Direct Approach to False Discovery Rates
• Operating Characteristics and Extensions of the False Discovery Rate Procedure
• On the estimation of the proportion of positives in a sequence of screening experiments
• The Optimal Discovery Procedure: A New Approach to Simultaneous Significance Testing
• Statistical significance for genomewide studies