The effects of beliefs versus risk attitude on bargaining outcomes
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1025642
DOI10.1007/s11238-007-9075-xzbMath1163.91366OpenAlexW2153474942MaRDI QIDQ1025642
Publication date: 19 June 2009
Published in: Theory and Decision (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: http://libres.uncg.edu/ir/asu/f/Dickinson_David_2009_The_Effects_of_Belief.pdf
Related Items (3)
The conservative Kalai-Smorodinsky solution for multiple scenario bargaining ⋮ Bargaining with a residual claimant: an experimental study ⋮ Nonbinding recommendations: The relative effects of focal points versus uncertainty reduction on bargaining outcomes
Cites Work
- Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty
- Reinterpreting arbitration's narcotic effect: An experimental study of learning in repeated bargaining
- Separating marginal utility and probabilistic risk aversion
- Risk seeking with diminishing marginal utility in a non-expected utility model
- Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms
- The Bargaining Problem
- Choice-Based Elicitation and Decomposition of Decision Weights for Gains and Losses Under Uncertainty
- Perfect Equilibrium in a Bargaining Model
- Risk Aversion and Nash's Solution for Bargaining Games with Risky Outcomes
- A Theory of Disagreement in Bargaining
- Strategic Delay in Bargaining with Two-Sided Uncertainty
- An Experimental Comparison of Dispute Rates in Alternative Arbitration Systems
- The Dual Theory of Choice under Risk
This page was built for publication: The effects of beliefs versus risk attitude on bargaining outcomes