One true logic?

DOI10.1007/s10992-008-9082-6zbMath1179.03010OpenAlexW2086801237MaRDI QIDQ1029825

Gillian Russell

Publication date: 13 July 2009

Published in: Journal of Philosophical Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-008-9082-6

zbMATH Keywords

validitylogical pluralismconstituents of argumentstruth-bearer

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05)

Related Items

Pluralistic perspectives on logic: an introduction ⋮ Logical pluralism without the normativity ⋮ Why logical pluralism? ⋮ A survey of logical realism ⋮ The collapse of logical pluralism has been greatly exaggerated ⋮ Exhibiting interpretational and representational validity ⋮ What’s So Bad About Second-Order Logic? ⋮ Counterlogicals as counterconventionals ⋮ From natural to formal language: a case for logical pluralism ⋮ A measure of inferential-role preservation ⋮ Problems for Logical Pluralism

Cites Work

• On ω-inconsistency and a so-called axiom of infinity
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item