Double vision: two questions about the neo-Fregean program

DOI10.1007/s11229-007-9260-zzbMath1182.03019OpenAlexW2090459414MaRDI QIDQ1036082

John MacFarlane

Publication date: 4 November 2009

Published in: Synthese (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-007-9260-z

zbMATH Keywords

Hume's principleneologicismsingular termimplicit definitionneo-Fregean

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophy of mathematics (00A30) Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05)

Related Items (3)

TWO-SORTED FREGE ARITHMETIC IS NOT CONSERVATIVE ⋮ Singular terms revisited ⋮ Rescuing implicit definition from abstractionism

Cites Work

• Frege's proof of referentiality
• Finitude and Hume's principle
• Cardinality, counting, and equinumerosity
• ‘Neo-Logicist‘ Logic is not Epistemically Innocent
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item

This page was built for publication: Double vision: two questions about the neo-Fregean program