Hume's big brother: Counting concepts and the bad company objection
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1036087
DOI10.1007/s11229-007-9264-8zbMath1182.03012OpenAlexW1968530379MaRDI QIDQ1036087
Publication date: 4 November 2009
Published in: Synthese (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-007-9264-8
Philosophy of mathematics (00A30) Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05)
Related Items (1)
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Neo-Fregeanism: an embarrassment of riches
- Iteration one more time
- Well- and non-well-founded Fregean extensions
- Finitude and Hume's principle
- Frege meets Dedekind: A neologicist treatment of real analysis
- Abstraction and set theory
- ‘Neo-Logicist‘ Logic is not Epistemically Innocent
- The development of arithmetic in Frege'sGrundgesetze der arithmetik
- Prolegomenon To Any Future Neo‐Logicist Set Theory: Abstraction And Indefinite Extensibility
- New V, ZF and Abstraction†
- Nominalism Through De‐Nominalization
- Powers of regular cardinals
- Is Hume's principle analytic?
This page was built for publication: Hume's big brother: Counting concepts and the bad company objection