Consistency of beliefs and epistemic conditions for Nash and correlated equilibria
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1036567
DOI10.1016/j.geb.2009.02.003zbMath1180.91019OpenAlexW2053135669MaRDI QIDQ1036567
Publication date: 13 November 2009
Published in: Games and Economic Behavior (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2009.02.003
Related Items (13)
Behavior and deliberation in perfect-information games: Nash equilibrium and backward induction ⋮ Weakly rational expectations ⋮ Lexicographic agreeing to disagree and perfect equilibrium ⋮ Robustness of equilibrium in the Kyle model of informed speculation ⋮ Two definitions of correlated equilibrium ⋮ The cycles approach ⋮ Pairwise epistemic conditions for Nash equilibrium ⋮ Correlated-belief equilibrium ⋮ Common priors under endogenous uncertainty ⋮ Generalized Nash equilibrium without common belief in rationality ⋮ From posteriors to priors via cycles ⋮ PEOPLE WITH COMMON PRIORS CAN AGREE TO DISAGREE ⋮ Consistent beliefs in extensive form games
Cites Work
- Coherent behavior in noncooperative games
- Formulation of Bayesian analysis for games with incomplete information
- The Bayesian foundations of solution concepts of games
- Agreeing to disagree
- Common priors and separation of convex sets
- Characterizing common priors in the form of posteriors
- Hierarchies of beliefs and common knowledge
- On the duality between prior beliefs and trading demands
- On \(p\)-rationalizability and approximate common certainty of rationality
- The positive foundation of the common prior assumption
- Common beliefs and the existence of speculative trade
- Correlated Equilibrium as an Expression of Bayesian Rationality
- Trade with Heterogeneous Prior Beliefs and Asymmetric Information
- A Comment on Aumann's Bayesian View
- Epistemic Conditions for Nash Equilibrium, and Common Knowledge of Rationality
- Sharing Beliefs: Between Agreeing and Disagreeing
- On the Strategic Stability of Equilibria
- Epistemic Conditions for Nash Equilibrium
- Finite Order Implications of Common Priors
This page was built for publication: Consistency of beliefs and epistemic conditions for Nash and correlated equilibria