An axiomatic analysis of concordance-discordance relations

DOI10.1016/j.ejor.2008.11.011zbMath1176.90272OpenAlexW2136914704MaRDI QIDQ1042167

Denis Bouyssou, Marc Pirlot

Publication date: 7 December 2009

Published in: European Journal of Operational Research (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2008.11.011

zbMATH Keywords

concordanceconjoint measurementmultiple criteria analysisoutranking methodsdiscordancenon-transitive preferences

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Management decision making, including multiple objectives (90B50)

Related Items (10)

ELECTRE Methods: A Survey on Roman Słowiński Contributions ⋮ ELECTRE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications ⋮ Integrating large positive and negative performance differences into multicriteria majority-rule sorting models ⋮ Simple ranking method using reference profiles: incremental elicitation of the preference parameters ⋮ A gained and lost dominance score method with conflict analysis for green economy development evaluation ⋮ A consolidated approach to the axiomatization of outranking relations: a survey and new results ⋮ Making choices with a binary relation: relative choice axioms and transitive closures ⋮ On the relations between ELECTRE TRI-B and ELECTRE TRI-C and on a new variant of ELECTRE TRI-B ⋮ A note on the asymmetric part of an outranking relation ⋮ An axiomatic analysis of concordance-discordance relations

Uses Software

• ELECTRE

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Following the traces: an introduction to conjoint measurement without transitivity and additivity
• Evaluation and decision models with multiple criteria. Stepping stones for the analyst.
• An axiomatic approach to noncompensatory sorting methods in MCDM. I: The case of two categories
• Further results on concordance relations
• An axiomatic analysis of concordance-discordance relations
• On the problem of weights in multiple criteria decision making (the noncompensatory approach)
• Some remarks on the notion of compensation in MCDM
• Noncompensatory and generalized noncompensatory preference structures
• Biorder families, valued relations, and preference modelling
• Noncompensatory preferences
• `Additive difference' models without additivity and subtractivity
• Nontransitive decomposable conjoint measurement.
• Preferences for multi-attributed alternatives: traces, dominance, and numerical representations
• A characterization of concordance relations
• Semiorders and a Theory of Utility Discrimination
• Axioms for Lexicographic Preferences
• A Common Framework for Describing Some Outranking Methods
• A characterization of generalized concordance rules in multicriteria decision making
• Outranking Relations: Do They Have Special Properties?
• Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis
• An axiomatic approach to noncompensatory sorting methods in MCDM. II: M ore than two categories

This page was built for publication: An axiomatic analysis of concordance-discordance relations