Probability amalgamation and the independence issue: A reply to Laddaga

DOI10.1007/BF00485827zbMath0519.60004MaRDI QIDQ1054345

Keith Lehrer, Carl G. Wagner

Publication date: 1983

Published in: Synthese (Search for Journal in Brave)

zbMATH Keywords

independenceconsensusprobability amalgamationprobability assignment problems

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Axioms; other general questions in probability (60A05)

Related Items (13)

Joint desirability foundations of social choice and opinion pooling ⋮ Further evidence against independence preservation in expert judgement synthesis ⋮ Conditionally externally Bayesian pooling operators in chain graphs ⋮ Meta-inductive probability aggregation ⋮ Probability aggregation methods in geoscience ⋮ The joint aggregation of beliefs and degrees of belief ⋮ Probabilistic opinion pooling with imprecise probabilities ⋮ Dating Hypatia's birth: a probabilistic model ⋮ Peer disagreement and independence preservation ⋮ Pooling operators with the marginalization property ⋮ How to resolve doxastic disagreement ⋮ Aggregating incoherent agents who disagree ⋮ Independent natural extension for choice functions

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Allocation, Lehrer models, and the consensus of probabilities
• Lehrer and the consensus proposal
• The Opinion Pool
• Marginalization and Linear Opinion Pools
• Reaching a Consensus
• When Rational Disagreement is Impossible

This page was built for publication: Probability amalgamation and the independence issue: A reply to Laddaga