The Condorcet criterion and committee selection
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1060661
DOI10.1016/0165-4896(85)90043-5zbMath0568.90006OpenAlexW1976060283MaRDI QIDQ1060661
Publication date: 1985
Published in: Mathematical Social Sciences (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4896(85)90043-5
Related Items (22)
On stable rules for selecting committees ⋮ Properties of multiwinner voting rules ⋮ A social choice approach to ordinal group activity selection ⋮ It is difficult to tell if there is a Condorcet spanning tree ⋮ The expanding approvals rule: improving proportional representation and monotonicity ⋮ Social acceptability and the majoritarian compromise rule ⋮ Gehrlein stable committee with multi-modal preferences ⋮ Coincidence of Condorcet committees ⋮ How hard is it to tell which is a Condorcet committee? ⋮ How to choose a non-controversial list with \(k\) names ⋮ POPULAR SPANNING TREES ⋮ Strategic voting in multi-winner elections with approval balloting: a theory for large electorates ⋮ Balancing the power to appoint officers ⋮ Robustness among multiwinner voting rules ⋮ Extensions of the Young and Levenglick result about the inconsistency of Condorcet voting correspondences ⋮ On the rule of \(k\) names ⋮ Does Choosing Committees from Approval Balloting Fulfill the Electorate’s Will? ⋮ Social acceptability of Condorcet committees ⋮ When are committees of Condorcet winners Condorcet winning committees? ⋮ Electing a committee with dominance constraints ⋮ Condorcet winning sets ⋮ The probability that all weighted scoring rules elect the same winner
Cites Work
- Integration over a simplex, truncated cubes, and Eulerian numbers
- Single-stage election procedures for large electorates
- Majority efficiencies for simple voting procedures: Summary and interpretation
- Probabilities of election outcomes for large electorates
- An Analysis of Simple Voting Systems for Electing Committees
This page was built for publication: The Condorcet criterion and committee selection
