Is the selected population the best?

DOI10.1214/aos/1176350281zbMath0623.62021OpenAlexW2076029419MaRDI QIDQ1091693

Zakhar Maymin, Sam Gutmann

Publication date: 1987

Published in: The Annals of Statistics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176350281

zbMATH Keywords

selectionmonotone likelihood ratiolocation familiesprobability of a false inferenceretrospective hypothesestwo-sample two-sided test for difference of meansunknown, estimable, common variance

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Parametric hypothesis testing (62F03) Statistical ranking and selection procedures (62F07)

Related Items

Tests uniformly more powerful than uniformly most powerful monotone tests, Is the Selected Population the Best?—Location and Scale Parameter Cases, Frequentist properties of a Bayesian analog to Fabian's bound, Duality between multiple testing and selecting, Testing retrospective hypotheses, Least significant spacing for ‘one versus the rest’ normal populations, Rank verification for exponential families, Does the Selected Normal Population Have the Smallest Variance?, Exact simultaneous confidence intervals for multiple comparisons with the mean, Is the Selected Multinomial Cell the Best?, Simultaneous lower confidence bounds for probabilities of correct selections, Combining two classical approaches for statistical selection, On lower confidence bounds for pcs in truncated location parameter models