Three practical criteria of comparison among ordinal preference aggregating rules

DOI10.1016/0377-2217(94)00012-2zbMath0912.90007OpenAlexW2077626054MaRDI QIDQ1127146

S. H. Smith

Publication date: 13 August 1998

Published in: European Journal of Operational Research (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(94)00012-2

zbMATH Keywords

simulationmultiple criteria analysisconsistency propertiesmethods of aggregation

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Decision theory (91B06)

Related Items (2)

Towards a theory of MCDM: Stepping away from social choice theory ⋮ Une typologie des méthodes multicritères: Proposition d'un cadre méthodologique

Cites Work

• Voting schemes for which it can be difficult to tell who won the election
• Priority Ranking and Consensus Formation
• Social Choice Theory: A Re-Examination
• Condorcet Social Choice Functions
• A Consistent Extension of Condorcet’s Election Principle
• Subset Choice Conditions and the Computation of Social Choice Sets
• Theoretical elements of comparison among ordinal discrete multicriteria methods
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item

This page was built for publication: Three practical criteria of comparison among ordinal preference aggregating rules