A minimax algorithm better than alpha-beta?

From MaRDI portal
Publication:1131840

DOI10.1016/0004-3702(79)90016-XzbMath0418.68041OpenAlexW1982977005MaRDI QIDQ1131840

George C. Stockman

Publication date: 1979

Published in: Artificial Intelligence (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(79)90016-x




Related Items (29)

A generalization of alpha-beta and \(SSS^*\) search proceduresA general framework for minimax search in game treesGame tree searching by min/max approximationSearching minimax game trees under memory space constraintA general heuristic bottom-up procedure for searching AND/OR graphsConspiracy numbers for min-max searchBest-first minimax searchSearching game trees under a partial orderBest-first fixed-depth minimax algorithmsAsymptotic properties of minimax trees and game-searching proceduresThe last player theoremA game tree with distinct leaf values which is easy for the alpha-beta algorithmA faster alternative to \(SSS^*\) with extension to variable memoryOn game graph structure and its influence on pathologyAWT: Aspiration with Timer Search Algorithm in SiguoTwo-agent IDA*Computer Go: An AI oriented surveyOn solving the 7,7,5-game and the 8,8,5-gameIs SSS* better than alpha-beta?A general branch and bound formulation for understanding and synthesizing And/Or tree search proceduresA minimax algorithm better than alpha-beta? Yes and noPathology on game trees revisited, and an alternative to minimaxingA comparison of minimax tree search algorithmsGeneral branch and bound, and its relation to \(A^*\) and \(AO^*\)A solution to the GHI problem for best-first searchGame tree algorithms and solution treesA quantitative analysis of the alpha-beta pruning algorithmProof-number searchAn analysis of the conspiracy numbers algorithm



Cites Work


This page was built for publication: A minimax algorithm better than alpha-beta?