Threats, counter-threats and strategic manipulation for non-binary group decision rules
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1162263
DOI10.1016/0165-4896(82)90063-4zbMath0479.90012OpenAlexW2057744447MaRDI QIDQ1162263
Publication date: 1982
Published in: Mathematical Social Sciences (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4896(82)90063-4
strategyproofnessstrategic manipulationnon-manipulabilitycounter-threatsk-Pareto rulenon-binary group decision rulesunanimity rules
Related Items (5)
Manipulation of nonimposed, nonoligarchic, nonbinary group decision rules ⋮ Vote swapping in irresolute two-tier voting procedures ⋮ Set-monotonicity implies Kelly-strategyproofness ⋮ Weak strategy proofness: The case of nonbinary social choice functions ⋮ On a class of strictly nonmanipulable collective choice rules
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Coalitional manipulation and the Pareto rule
- Manipulation and the Pareto rule
- Strategic voting under minimally binary group decision functions
- Strategy-proofness and Arrow's conditions: existence and correspondence theorems for voting procedures and social welfare functions
- Manipulation of social choice functions
- Manipulation of social decision functions
- The Bargaining Problem
- Threats, Counter-Threats, and Strategic Voting
- Manipulation of Voting Schemes: A General Result
- Strategy-Proofness and Social Choice Functions without Singlevaluedness
- Manipulation of Schemes that Mix Voting with Chance
- The Manipulation of Social Choice Mechanisms that Do Not Leave "Too Much" to Chance
- Straightforwardness of Game Forms with Lotteries as Outcomes
- A Set of Independent Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Simple Majority Decision
This page was built for publication: Threats, counter-threats and strategic manipulation for non-binary group decision rules