Condorcet efficiency and constant scoring rules
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1162267
DOI10.1016/0165-4896(82)90061-0zbMath0479.90015OpenAlexW2042545119MaRDI QIDQ1162267
Publication date: 1982
Published in: Mathematical Social Sciences (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4896(82)90061-0
Condorcet efficiencyCondorcet winnerconstant scoring rulesexact closed form relationsthree element rankingstwo stage constant rules
Related Items
The expected likelihood of transitivity: A survey, On the probability of electing the Condorcet loser, The expected likelihood of transitivity for probabilistic choosers with single-peaked preferences, Condorcet efficiency of simple voting rules for large electorates, Should voters be required to rank candidates in an election?, The Effect of Closeness on the Election of a Pairwise Majority Rule Winner, From Gehrlein-Fishburn’s Method on Frequency Representation to a Direct Proof of Ehrhart’s extended Conjecture, IAC Probability Calculations in Voting Theory: Progress Report, Monotonicity paradoxes in three-candidate elections using scoring elimination rules, The effectiveness of weighted scoring rules when pairwise majority rule cycles exist., The impact of voters' preference diversity on the probability of some electoral outcomes, Exploiting polyhedral symmetries in social choice, Probability calculations under the IAC hypothesis, The Condorcet efficiency of Borda Rule with anonymous voters, The sensitivity of weight selection for scoring rules to profile proximity to single-peaked preferences, Voting cycles, plurality rule and strategic manipulation, Constant scoring rules, Condorcet criteria and single-peaked preferences, The likelihood of monotonicity paradoxes in run-off elections, The unexpected behavior of plurality rule
Cites Work