An experimental and theoretical investigation of the constant-ratio rule and other models of visual letter confusion

DOI10.1016/0022-2496(82)90009-8zbMath0499.92024OpenAlexW2020127675MaRDI QIDQ1172019

James T. Townsend, Douglas E. Landon

Publication date: 1982

Published in: Journal of Mathematical Psychology (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(82)90009-8

zbMATH Keywords

visual perceptionconstant-ratio rulealphabetic confusion paradigmconfusion-choice modelsmodels of visual letter confusionpsychological experimentssimilarity choice model

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis (62P10) Mathematical psychology (91E99)

Related Items

Relations between exemplar-similarity and likelihood models of classification, Comparing the biased choice model and multidimensional decision bound models of identification, Alternative biased choice models, Compact integer-programming models for extracting subsets of stimuli from confusion matrices, Consistent aggregation of simply scalable families of choice probabilities, Mathematical models of recognition and confusion in psychology

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Mathematical models of recognition and confusion in psychology
• Monotonic models for asymmetric proximities
• Finite and infinite state confusion models
• On Luce's choice axiom
• The relationship between Luce's choice axiom, Thurstone's theory of comparative judgment, and the double exponential distribution
• A clarification of some current multiplicative confusion models
• Axiomatic thermodynamics and extensive measurement
• Conditions for the representation of absolute judgment and pair comparison isosensitivity curves by cumulative distributions
• Biscalability of error matrices and all-or-none reaction time theories
• Contribution à l'analyse statistique des tableaux de corrélation
• SOME RESULTS CONCERNING THE IDENTIFIABILITY OF PARALLEL AND SERIAL PROCESSES
• The Large-Sample Distribution of the Likelihood Ratio for Testing Composite Hypotheses