Reflecting stationary sets and successors of singular cardinals

From MaRDI portal
Publication:1179532

DOI10.1007/BF01370693zbMath0742.03017OpenAlexW2007936948MaRDI QIDQ1179532

Saharon Shelah

Publication date: 26 June 1992

Published in: Archive for Mathematical Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01370693




Related Items (52)

Compactness versus hugeness at successor cardinalsOn properties of theories which preclude the existence of universal modelsCanonical structure in the universe of set theory. IWeak Compactness and No Partial SquaresThe approachability ideal without a maximal setBorel reductions and cub games in generalised descriptive set theoryBounded stationary reflection. II.A weak variation of shelah's I[ω2] ⋮ Cofinalities of elementary substructures of structures on \(\aleph_ \omega\)Saturated filters at successors of singulars, weak reflection and yet another weak club principleAnother method for constructing models of not approachability and not SCHIn memoriam: James Earl Baumgartner (1943--2011)Separating weak partial square principlesWeak saturation properties and side conditionsKNASTER AND FRIENDS III: SUBADDITIVE COLORINGSScales with various kinds of good pointsSigma-Prikry forcing. III: Down to \(\aleph_{\omega}\)The canary tree revisitedPartitioning a reflecting stationary setAlmost free groups and long Ehrenfeucht-Fraïssé gamesSuccessive cardinals with no partial squareUniversality: new criterion for non-existenceApplications of PCF theoryThe generalized continuum hypothesis revisitedSQUARES, SCALES AND STATIONARY REFLECTIONTHE EIGHTFOLD WAYGuessing models and the approachability idealA FORCING NOTION COLLAPSING $\aleph _3 $ AND PRESERVING ALL OTHER CARDINALSMitchell's theorem revisitedMore on simple forcing notions and forcings with idealsNon-reflection of the bad set for \(\check{I}_\theta[\lambda\) and pcf] ⋮ Middle diamondOn SCH and the approachability propertyMore on the revised GCH and the black boxSquare and non-reflection in the context of \(\mathcal P_{\kappa}\lambda\)Bounded stationary reflection𝐼[𝜔₂ can be the nonstationary ideal on 𝐶𝑜𝑓(𝜔₁)] ⋮ Categoricity of an abstract elementary class in two successive cardinals\(\mathrm{ZF}+\mathrm{DC}+\mathrm{AX}_4\)Telgársky's conjecture may failGlobal Chang's conjecture and singular cardinalsA model of Cummings and Foreman revisitedSome applications of mixed support iterationsShelah's pcf theory and its applicationsThe two-cardinals transfer property and resurrection of supercompactness 󠀼span style=󠀢color:red󠀢󠀾This article has been retracted󠀼/span󠀾AN EQUICONSISTENCY RESULT ON PARTIAL SQUARESFake reflectionOn the ideal \(J[\kappa\)] ⋮ Approachability at the second successor of a singular cardinalAlmost free groups and Ehrenfeucht-Fraïssé games for successors of singular cardinalsHIGHER MILLER FORCING MAY COLLAPSE CARDINALSAdding closed unbounded subsets of \(\omega_2\) with finite forcing



Cites Work


This page was built for publication: Reflecting stationary sets and successors of singular cardinals