Why Friedman's non-monotonic reasoning defies Hempel's covering law model

DOI10.1007/BF00485811zbMath0758.03016MaRDI QIDQ1202503

S. Singh

Publication date: 2 February 1993

Published in: Synthese (Search for Journal in Brave)

zbMATH Keywords

philosophy of sciencebusiness cycleincomplete knowledgeelectric circuitHempel's covering law modellogic for causal explanationnon-monotonic epistemic logic

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Other nonclassical logic (03B60) Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05)

Related Items

Is default logic a reinvention of inductive-statistical reasoning?, The case for psychologism in default and inheritance reasoning

Cites Work

• A theory of diagnosis from first principles
• Chronological ignorance: Experiments in nonmonotonic temporal reasoning
• Epistemology Without Knowledge and Without Belief