A formal statement of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen argument

DOI10.1007/BF00682560zbMath0398.03003MaRDI QIDQ1254301

James H. McGrath

Publication date: 1978

Published in: International Journal of Theoretical Physics (Search for Journal in Brave)

zbMATH Keywords

Quantum MechanicsPhilosophical LogicFormal Analysis

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Foundations, quantum information and its processing, quantum axioms, and philosophy (81P99)

Related Items (3)

Einstein completeness as categoricity ⋮ When champions meet: rethinking the Bohr-Einstein debate ⋮ Bibliography on quantum logics and related structures

Cites Work

• Further Considerations on Electromagnetic Potentials in the Quantum Theory
• The Statistical Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics
• Two Deviant Logics for Quantum Theory: Bohr and Reichenbach
• Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?
• Is the Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Complete?
• Note on the Quantum-Mechanical Theory of Measurement
• Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete?
• ON THE NOTIONS OF CAUSALITY AND COMPLEMENTARITY¹
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item

This page was built for publication: A formal statement of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen argument