Comparison of the closed-loop identification methods in terms of the bias distribution
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1274247
DOI10.1016/S0167-6911(97)00137-0zbMath0909.93010OpenAlexW1981069300MaRDI QIDQ1274247
Ioan Doré Landau, Alireza Karimi
Publication date: 12 January 1999
Published in: Systems \& Control Letters (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-6911(97)00137-0
closed-loop identificationidentification for controloutput errorbias distributionfiltered direct method
Related Items
Recursive algorithms for identification in closed loop: A unified approach and evaluation ⋮ Control relevant estimation of plant and disturbance dynamics ⋮ Closed-loop identification of power system based on ambient data ⋮ Closed-loop identification of multivariable systems: with or without excitation of all references? ⋮ Some remarks on the bias distribution analysis of discrete-time identification algorithms based on pseudo-linear regressions ⋮ A unified approach to model estimation and controller reduction (duality and coherence)
Cites Work
- On covariance function tests used in system identification
- An indirect method for transfer function estimation from closed loop data
- An output error recursive algorithm for unbiased identification in closed loop
- Recursive algorithms for identification in closed loop: A unified approach and evaluation
- Iterative weighted least-squares identification and weighted LQG control design
- Identification and control -- Closed-loop issues
- Accurate identification for control: the necessity of an iterative scheme
- Unnamed Item