Closed procedures are better and often admit a shortcut.
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1298886
DOI10.1016/S0378-3758(98)00125-6zbMath1054.62507WikidataQ56765260 ScholiaQ56765260MaRDI QIDQ1298886
Yosef Hochberg, Eugene Grechanovsky
Publication date: 1999
Published in: Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference (Search for Journal in Brave)
Admissibility in statistical decision theory (62C15) Paired and multiple comparisons; multiple testing (62J15) Complete class results in statistical decision theory (62C07)
Related Items (3)
On stepwise control of the generalized familywise error rate ⋮ Optimally weighted, fixed sequence and gatekeeper multiple testing procedures ⋮ Multiple testing for exploratory research
Cites Work
- Multiple test procedures for arbitrary dependence structures
- Sequentially rejective pairwise testing procedures
- A new closed multiple testing procedure for hierarchical families of hypotheses
- Extensions of multiple testing procedures based on Simes' test
- Generalized Maximum Range Tests for Pairwise Comparisons of Several Populations
- A Multiple Comparison Procedure for Comparing Several Treatments with a Control
- Modified Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedures
- A stagewise rejective multiple test procedure based on a modified Bonferroni test
- A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance
- Some selection rules for comparing p processes with a standard
- On closed testing procedures with special reference to ordered analysis of variance
- On a Fundamental Theorem in Multiple Comparisons
- An improved Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
This page was built for publication: Closed procedures are better and often admit a shortcut.
