Comparison of different implementation algorithms for HiSS constitutive models in FEM
DOI10.1016/S0020-7683(98)00273-XzbMATH Open0948.74069MaRDI QIDQ1302401
Publication date: 26 November 2000
Published in: International Journal of Solids and Structures (Search for Journal in Brave)
modified Euler methoddisplacement controlled rigid footingelastic predictor-plastic corrector methodhierarchical single surface modelimplicit integration methodload controlled flexible footingplastic predictor-plastic corrector method
Small-strain, rate-independent theories of plasticity (including rigid-plastic and elasto-plastic materials) (74C05) Finite element methods applied to problems in solid mechanics (74S05)
Uses Software
Recommendations
- Title not available (Why is that?) π π
- A comparison of mapping algorithms for hierarchical adaptive FEM in finite elasto-plasticity π π
- Consistent numerical implementation of hypoelastic constitutive models π π
- Comparison of different FETI preconditioners for elastoplasticity π π
- A comparison of computational complexities of HFEM and ABC based infinite element methods π π
- Fast algorithms for setting up the stiffness matrix in \(hp\)-FEM: a comparison π π
- Comparison of finite element methods for the diffusion problem π π
- Effective constitutive algorithms in elastoplasticity and elastoviscoplasticity π π
- Comparison Results of Finite Element Methods for the Poisson Model Problem π π
- Finite element implementation of a certain class of elasto-viscoplastic constitutive models π π
This page was built for publication: Comparison of different implementation algorithms for HiSS constitutive models in FEM
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1302401)