On unbiasedness of the empirical BLUE and BLUP
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1304079
DOI10.1016/S0167-7152(98)00115-1zbMath0944.62055OpenAlexW1965380540MaRDI QIDQ1304079
Publication date: 24 September 2000
Published in: Statistics \& Probability Letters (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-7152(98)00115-1
expectationsbest linear unbiased estimatormixed modelsbest linear unbiased predictorempirical BLUEempirical BLUP
Related Items (3)
Estimating heterogeneous causal effects in observational studies using small area predictors ⋮ Leverage analysis for linear mixed models ⋮ A matrix inequality and its statistical application
Cites Work
- That BLUP is a good thing: The estimation of random effects. With comments and a rejoinder by the author
- Approximations for Standard Errors of Estimators of Fixed and Random Effect in Mixed Linear Models
- The Estimation of Environmental and Genetic Trends from Records Subject to Culling
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
This page was built for publication: On unbiasedness of the empirical BLUE and BLUP