What can and what cannot be inferred from pairwise sequence comparisons?

DOI10.1016/S0025-5564(98)10044-5zbMath0940.92017OpenAlexW2083238085WikidataQ52224189 ScholiaQ52224189MaRDI QIDQ1307063

Ellen Baake

Publication date: 26 July 2000

Published in: Mathematical Biosciences (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0025-5564(98)10044-5

zbMATH Keywords

identifiabilityphylogenetic reconstructionMarkov processes on treesadditive distancesrate heterogeneity

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Problems related to evolution (92D15) Markov processes (60J99)

Related Items (5)

A basic limitation on inferring phylogenies by pairwise sequence comparisons ⋮ An algebraic analysis of the two state Markov model on tripod trees ⋮ Letter to editor: Rate-variation need not defeat phylogenetic inference through pairwise sequence comparisons ⋮ Tree representations of non-symmetric group-valued proximities ⋮ Identifying evolutionary trees and substitution parameters for the general Markov model with invariable sites

Uses Software

• fastDNAml

Cites Work

• Reconstructing the shape of a tree from observed dissimilarity data
• Full reconstruction of Markov models on evolutionary trees: identifiability and consistency.
• Taxonomy with confidence
• Distance measures in terms of substitution processes
• Recovering a tree from the leaf colourations it generates under a Markov model
• Inconsistency of evolutionary tree topology reconstruction methods when substitution rates vary across characters
• Asynchronous Distance between Homologous DNA Sequences
• Finite Continuous Time Markov Chains

This page was built for publication: What can and what cannot be inferred from pairwise sequence comparisons?