Justification and defeat
From MaRDI portal
Publication:1329366
DOI10.1016/0004-3702(94)90057-4zbMath0807.68085OpenAlexW2118735566MaRDI QIDQ1329366
Publication date: 4 July 1994
Published in: Artificial Intelligence (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(94)90057-4
Related Items
On precise and correct qualitative probabilistic inference, A two-phase method for extracting explanatory arguments from Bayesian networks, Explaining Bayesian Networks Using Argumentation, Two approaches to the problems of self-attacking arguments and general odd-length cycles of attack, Argumentation through a distributed self-stabilizing approach, The first international competition on computational models of argumentation: results and analysis, Minimal hypotheses: extension-based semantics to argumentation, Mathematical Arguments and Distributed Knowledge, CONCILIATORY REASONING, SELF-DEFEAT, AND ABSTRACT ARGUMENTATION, Weakest link in formal argumentation: lookahead and principle-based analysis, An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning, Abstract argumentation systems, Stratified belief bases revision with argumentative inference, A proof theoretic approach to qualitative probabilistic reasoning, SCC-recursiveness: a general schema for argumentation semantics, Self-stabilizing defeat status computation: dealing with conflict management in multi-agent systems, REWARD VERSUS RISK IN UNCERTAIN INFERENCE: THEOREMS AND SIMULATIONS, Cost-bounded argumentation, Semantics for a theory of defeasible reasoning, Towards Context Sensitive Defeasible Rules, A labelling framework for probabilistic argumentation, Defeasible reasoning with variable degrees of justification, Explanation in AI and law: past, present and future, Probabilistic argumentation: an approach based on conditional probability. A preliminary report, OSCAR, Reaching agreements through argumentation: a logical model and implementation, Extending abstract argumentation systems theory, On the structure of rational acceptance: Comments on Hawthorne and Bovens, On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and \(n\)-person games
Uses Software
Cites Work
