Reply to Schenkerman's avoiding rank reversal in AHP decision support models

DOI10.1016/0377-2217(94)90221-6zbMath0925.90234OpenAlexW2064643245MaRDI QIDQ1333546

Luis G. Vargas

Publication date: 8 November 1999

Published in: European Journal of Operational Research (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(94)90221-6

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Decision theory (91B06) Management decision making, including multiple objectives (90B50)

Related Items (9)

On rank reversal in decision analysis ⋮ On rank reversal and TOPSIS method ⋮ On the efficacy of modeling multi-attribute decision problems using AHP and Sinarchy ⋮ The state-of-the-art integrations and applications of the analytic hierarchy process ⋮ A quality control approach to consistency paradoxes in AHP ⋮ Evaluating alternative production cycles using the extended fuzzy AHP method ⋮ A simulation-based evaluation of the approximate and the exact eigenvector methods employed in AHP ⋮ A probabilistic interpretation of the final rankings in AHP ⋮ The geometric consistency index: approximated thresholds

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item

This page was built for publication: Reply to Schenkerman's avoiding rank reversal in AHP decision support models