How probabilities came to be objective and subjective

DOI10.1006/hmat.1994.1028zbMath0805.01009OpenAlexW2058979853MaRDI QIDQ1337060

Lorraine Daston

Publication date: 26 October 1994

Published in: Historia Mathematica (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1006/hmat.1994.1028

zbMATH Keywords

determinismPoissonchanceCournotDe MoivreEllis

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

History of mathematics in the 19th century (01A55) History of probability theory (60-03)

Related Items (8)

The sources of Kolmogorov's \textit{Grundbegriffe} ⋮ Probabilistic annotations for protocol models. Dedicated to Joshua Guttman ⋮ A letter of Robert Leslie Ellis to William Walton on probability ⋮ Unknown quantum states: The quantum de Finetti representation ⋮ Remarks on the idealist and empiricist interpretation of frequentism: Robert Leslie Ellis versus John Venn ⋮ Robert Leslie Ellis's work on philosophy of science and the foundations of probability theory ⋮ The objective and the subjective in mid-nineteenth-century British probability theory ⋮ Contextuality, fine-tuning and teleological explanation

Cites Work

• Classical Probability in the Enlightenment, New Edition
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item

This page was built for publication: How probabilities came to be objective and subjective