Ricardian equivalence. Are the required assumptions defensible?

DOI10.1016/0165-1765(94)00475-7zbMATH Open0816.90031OpenAlexW2050689052MaRDI QIDQ1342685

James Pemberton

Publication date: 6 February 1995

Published in: Economics Letters (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(94)00475-7

zbMATH Keywords

Ricardian equivalence

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Economic growth models (91B62)

Recommendations

• Nominal rigidities equilibria in a non-Ricardian economy 👍 👎
• Ricardian Equivalence 👍 👎
• An equivalence principle for perfectly competitive economies 👍 👎
• Learning Ricardian equivalence 👍 👎
• Ricardian equivalence revisited: deficits, gifts and bequests 👍 👎
• A derivation of the money rawlsian solution 👍 👎
• Ricardian equivalence and the intertemporal Keynesian multiplier 👍 👎
• Existence of Equilibria for Monetary Economies 👍 👎

This page was built for publication: Ricardian equivalence. Are the required assumptions defensible?

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1342685)