Quantum strategies

From MaRDI portal
Publication:137124

DOI10.48550/ARXIV.QUANT-PH/9804010zbMATH Open0958.81007arXivquant-ph/9804010OpenAlexW3038125555WikidataQ56675305 ScholiaQ56675305MaRDI QIDQ137124

David A. Meyer, David A. Meyer

Publication date: 3 April 1998

Published in: Physical Review Letters (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: We consider game theory from the perspective of quantum algorithms. Strategies in classical game theory are either pure (deterministic) or mixed (probabilistic). We introduce these basic ideas in the context of a simple example, closely related to the traditional Matching Pennies game. While not every two-person zero-sum finite game has an equilibrium in the set of pure strategies, von Neumann showed that there is always an equilibrium at which each player follows a mixed strategy. A mixed strategy deviating from the equilibrium strategy cannot increase a player's expected payoff. We show, however, that in our example a player who implements a quantum strategy can increase his expected payoff, and explain the relation to efficient quantum algorithms. We prove that in general a quantum strategy is always at least as good as a classical one, and furthermore that when both players use quantum strategies there need not be any equilibrium, but if both are allowed mixed quantum strategies there must be.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9804010





Cites Work


Related Items (only showing first 100 items - show all)

NON-CLASSICAL QUANTUM CORRELATIONS IN QUANTUM GAMESTwo-player \(2 \times 2\) quantum game in spin systemStudy on the exit strategy selection mechanism of venture capital based on quantum gameQudits representations and computations of \(n\)-player many-valued quantum gamesDifferential quantum duopoly gamesEntropy-norm space for geometric selection of strict Nash equilibria in \(n\)-person gamesThe dynamics of a quantum Bertrand duopoly with differentiated products and heterogeneous expectationsQuantum coalition of ``\(n\) equipartition compound mode in minority gameInformation processing by networks of quantum decision makersQuantum Bertrand duopoly with differentiated productsGame-theoretic perspective of Ping-Pong protocolDynamic quantum gamesEVALUATING DETERMINISTIC POLICIES IN TWO-PLAYER ITERATED GAMESCollective quantum games with Werner-like statesREDUCED ENTANGLEMENT FOR QUANTUM GAMESStudy of potential games using Ising interactionINFLUENCE OF ENTANGLEMENT IN QUANTUM PARRONDO GAMEQuantum mean-field gamesQuantum game players can have advantage without discordQuantum Fuzzy Game SimulationIs the essence of a quantum game captured completely in the original classical game?Dynamical free energy based model for quantum decision makingSolving diner's dilemma game, circuit implementation and verification on the IBM quantum simulatorEntanglement and coherence in quantum prisoner's dilemmaFoundation of quantum optimal transport and applicationsPareto-optimal solution for the quantum battle of the sexesQuantum repeated pricing gameNonlocal correlations and noise in different settings of a two-player gameThe synchronization of discrete quantum chaotic maps with uncertainty via compensated control techniqueComparative dynamical study of a bound entangled stateNonlinear dynamics of a heterogeneous quantum commons' tragedyAn improvement of quantum prisoners' dilemma protocol of Eisert-Wilkens-LewensteinTo move first or not to move first?A quantum approach to twice-repeated \(2\times 2\) gameSignificance of entangling operators in the purview of modified EWL schemeNoisy three-player dilemma game: robustness of the quantum advantageDynamics of a heterogeneous quantum Cournot duopoly with adjusting players and quadratic costsCellular automaton simulation of the quantum war of attrition gameQuantum Stackelberg-Bertrand duopolyEntangled states that cannot reproduce original classical games in their quantum versionLinear optics implementation for quantum game with two playersHow to play two-player restricted quantum games with 10 cardsStudy of decoherence and memory in modified Eisert-Wilkens-Lewenstein schemeNonlinear dynamics in a heterogeneous quantum Cournot duopoly game with isoelastic demandCournot and Stackelberg duopoly games in the purview of modified EWL schemePerfect prediction in normal form: superrational thinking extended to non-symmetric gamesUnnamed ItemDecision theory with prospect interference and entanglementQuantum mixed duopoly games with a nonlinear demand functionLand bidding game with conflicting interest and its quantum solutionAsymmetric model of the quantum Stackelberg duopoly with incomplete informationEvolution of quantum and classical strategies on networks by group interactionsDecoherence effects in the quantum qubit flip game using Markovian approximationQuantum repeated games with continuous-variable strategiesModeling Coopetition as a Quantum GameDynamics of a discoordination game with classical and quantum correlationsQUANTUM MECHANISM HELPS AGENTS COMBAT "BAD" SOCIAL CHOICE RULESBistable probabilities: a unified framework for studying rationality and irrationality in classical and quantum games\(N\)-player quantum minority gameMultiplayer quantum games with continuous-variable strategiesAppropriate quantization of asymmetric games with continuous strategiesQuantum advantage does not survive in the presence of a corrupt source: optimal strategies in simultaneous move gamesQUANTUM COMPUTER: AN APPLIANCE FOR PLAYING MARKET GAMESEvolutionarily stable strategies in quantum gamesQuantum strategies of quantum measurementsCORRELATED EQUILIBRIA OF CLASSICAL STRATEGIC GAMES WITH QUANTUM SIGNALSQuantum Parrondo's game with random strategies¶How well do people play a quantum prisoner's dilemma?Quantum Parrondo's games under decoherenceQUANTUM AND CLASSICAL CORRELATIONS BETWEEN PLAYERS IN GAME THEORYResolving the trust predicament: A quantum game-theoretic approachQuantization of games: towards quantum artificial intelligenceQuantum cooperative gamesAn Introduction to Multi-player, Multi-choice Quantum Games: Quantum Minority Games & Kolkata Restaurant ProblemsNetwork Games with Quantum StrategiesDarwinism in quantum systems?Quantum prisoner's dilemma in a restricted one-parameter strategic spaceInformation and computation: Classical and quantum aspectsUnnamed ItemEntanglement sudden death and birth effects in two qubits maximally entangled mixed states under quantum channelsINVESTIGATION OF QUANTUM ROULETTEREVISITING NASERI'S SECURE QUANTUM SEALED-BID AUCTIONPositive operator valued measures and the quantum Monty Hall problemQuantum Games and Quantum StrategiesQuantum and Classical Game StrategiesThe quantum ultimatum gameOn Parrondo's paradox: how to construct unfair games by composing fair gamesThe influence of entanglement on complex dynamics of a quantum Stackelberg duopoly with heterogeneous expectationsNonlinear dynamics of a quantum Cournot duopoly game with heterogeneous playersInfluence of Dzyaloshinshkii-Moriya interaction on quantum correlations in two-qubit Werner states and MEMSQuantum Stackelberg oligopoly(In)significance of entangling operators in the noisy duopoly gamesTwo-player quantum games: when player strategies are via directional choicesA Quantum Game Semantics for the Measurement CalculusNonlinear quantum Cournot duopoly gamesDominant strategies in two-qubit quantum computationsQuantum Bayesian game with symmetric and asymmetric informationAsymmetric quantum Stackelberg duopoly game based on isoelastic demandQuantum games under decoherenceImproving the payoffs of cooperators in three-player cooperative game using weak measurements






This page was built for publication: Quantum strategies

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q137124)